LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Rural hospitals standing by to serve veterans

By David Pearson | Published Wednesday, May 24, 2014

News accounts of the Veterans Administration healthcare situation are disheartening, and it appears a great disservice has been done to some of our veterans who have served their country.

In light of the evolving situation, Texas rural hospitals and clinics are more than willing to step up and provide top-quality health care to these veterans on a local basis if Congress will let them.

The rural factor is especially important because a disproportionate number of veterans are from rural areas. In the case of Texas and across the country, 15 percent of the population lives in rural areas – however, 40 percent of the veterans are from rural areas.

The unfolding VA hospital drama brings to light another issue. For the most part, the Veterans Administration forces veterans to travel past their local physicians and hospitals, sometimes driving hundreds of miles to a VA facility. While the VA is sometimes willing to contract with local hospitals for limited services, those contracts are complicated and convoluted, and payments offered to the hospitals are far too low.

Some services are not available locally, but when they are, don’t we have a duty to our veterans to try and make their lives a little easier?

We think Congress should give thought to a system where veterans can see the doctor or hospital of their choice (within reason, of course) and the VA act more like an insurance company – paying providers directly, like it does for military retirees.

Why continue to carry on with a duplicative health care system that pushes a great inconvenience on to our veterans, especially those living in remote rural areas?

In the community of Childress, in northwest Texas, veterans must drive past their hospital to Amarillo (250 miles roundtrip) for a CT Scan. While the VA does pay for their mileage, there is no factor for time and inconvenience. Besides, waiting to get a CT done at an approved VA facility is probably longer and the service more costly, than in Childress.

So why not just let Childress perform the scan and pay them for the work? Keeping such services local is better for the patient and the facility. It’s a win-win.

Perhaps the VA facilities should primarily serve the veterans in their immediate vicinity, where there is a higher concentration of patients. Or we might consider an alternative coverage model that leverages programs that have proven to be more efficient and effective, like Medicare.

Congress could act on either option, but we must do something to ensure rural veterans have access to healthcare that is safe, timely and closer to home. We owe them that much.

One thing is certain, Texas rural hospitals are ready to do our part, if and when Congress needs us to.

David Pearson
President and CEO
Texas Organization of Rural and Community Hospitals

Leave a Reply. Note: As of March 24, 2011, all posted comments will include the users full name.

WCMessenger.com News and Blog Comment Guidelines

You must be logged in to post a comment.