Welcome to Wise

NEWS HEADLINES

County attorney calls for removal of Ross

By Kristen Tribe | Published Wednesday, October 30, 2013

County Attorney James Stainton filed an amended petition for removal Monday in the case against suspended Precinct 4 Commissioner Terry Ross.

James Stainton

James Stainton

The document calls for Ross to be removed from office without a jury trial.

“The game changed dramatically with the conviction,” said Stainton. “(Ross) signed a judicial confession to the things alleged in the indictment.”

The original petition for removal was filed by citizen Lane Akin in June 2012 when Ross was under indictment by a grand jury for tampering with government records and abuse of official capacity. In the months following the original petition, Ross was also indicted for theft of $500 to $1,500.

Just last month, Ross plead guilty to abuse of official capacity, and the other two charges were dismissed as part of a plea agreement, which gave him $500 restitution and 180 days in jail, probated for one year.

In the petition filed Monday in the 271st District Court, Stainton says Ross’ guilty plea and misuse of government property “constitutes official misconduct,” which can result in removal from office according to Local Government Code 87.013.

The code defines “official misconduct” as “intentional unlawful behavior relating to official duties by an officer entrusted with administration of justice or execution of the law. The term includes an intentional or corrupt failure, refusal or neglect of an officer to perform a duty imposed on the officer by law.”

Terry Ross

Terry Ross

Stainton also says in the petition that Ross should be removed for incompetency under the same code because his “actions constitute a gross ignorance of official duties” and he exhibited “gross carelessness in discharge of those duties.”

Stainton notes that the same section of code requires a jury trial for removal involving official misconduct, but he argues in the petition that since Ross waived his right to a jury trial through his guilty plea in the criminal case, a jury trial shouldn’t be required for Ross’ removal.

Ross sent a letter last week to Precinct 2 Commissioner Kevin Burns demanding he be reinstated to his position “with all his back pay and lawyer expenses, per the Texas Local Government Code.”

Ross also demanded that his personal items be returned immediately, including a “tree house with climbing wall and ladder; fish fryer with two, 5-gallon propane tanks; office chairs; diesel pump; picnic table; Stihl leaf blower; pressure washer; etc.”

As of Saturday, Nov. 2, Ross’ back pay will total $110,753.12.

Ross’ attorney, Trent Loftin, declined to comment on the amended petition for removal, but he did confirm that Ross sent a letter to the county demanding he get his job back.

Stainton has also filed an original petition for leave to file information in quo warranto, which asks the district judge to declare the Precinct 4 commissioner post “vacant,” if the removal goes through.

Stainton says the next steps include normal pre-trial procedures.

“I’m hopeful that because we’ve done so much investigation with the criminal case that this will move along faster than a typical civil case,” he said.

2 Responses to “County attorney calls for removal of Ross”

  1. Ross is demanding his job back? Wow. My fellow Americans, those who are sick of seeing the crap going on in Washington and those demanding change, it starts right here. Terry Ross is a thief. He was convicted of being, essentially, a dirty politician and now he is “Demanding” his job back. Mr. Ross may have weasled his way out of jailtime, but we don’t have to stand for him coming back. Call your commissioner, the County Attorney, and judge, write your letters to the editor, and lets make sure our own Washington beauracrat gets the punishment he really deserves and is not able to cheat his constituents out of any more money.

  2. “Ross also demanded that his personal items be returned immediately, including a “tree house with climbing wall and ladder; fish fryer with two, 5-gallon propane tanks; office chairs; diesel pump; picnic table; Stihl leaf blower; pressure washer; etc.”…
    When did these become his personal items? All of these items were bought (and built) with taxpayer money. These are items we paid for by us, not him. Maybe we should start demanding them to be returned to us.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply. Note: As of March 24, 2011, all posted comments will include the users full name.

WCMessenger.com News and Blog Comment Guidelines

You must be logged in to post a comment.